Skip to main content

Archived Article — The Daily Perspective is no longer active. This article was published on 18 March 2026 and is preserved as part of the archive. Read the farewell | Browse archive

Business

The EV Split: Automakers Pull Back in the US While Australia's Market Surges

As major manufacturers cancel electric vehicles overseas, Australia's rapidly growing EV market offers a contrasting vision of the technology's future.

The EV Split: Automakers Pull Back in the US While Australia's Market Surges
Image: The Verge
Key Points 3 min read
  • Global automakers including Honda, Ford and Nissan have cancelled or delayed electric vehicles due to weak demand and policy reversals in the US.
  • Major manufacturers have recorded nearly $70 billion in write-downs as they pivot back towards hybrids and conventional vehicles.
  • Australia's EV market grew 38.7% in 2025 and continues expanding, driven by Chinese competition and strong demand.
  • BMW's launch of its new electric i3 sedan suggests premium manufacturers are still betting on EVs in markets with stable policy.

In Munich last month, BMW unveiled the electric sedan it considers the most important vehicle in company history. The new i3 Neue Klasse sedan, arriving as a deliberate successor to the iconic 3 Series, carries 440 miles of estimated EPA range and features 400 kilowatts of charging power that can add 230 miles in ten minutes. It represents a significant technical commitment: a manufacturer of BMW's stature betting that electric sedans remain the future.

That gamble comes at a moment when such confidence appears almost quaint. Across the Atlantic, the auto industry is in retreat. At least 18 automakers are now canceling, delaying, or scaling back EV plans in the U.S., including major brands like Ford, Honda, Nissan, and Volkswagen. The list of dead or postponed vehicles reads like an automotive obituary: the Ford F-150 Lightning, once heralded as the electric truck that would change everything; Honda's 0 Series sedans and SUVs, abandoned months before production; Volvo's EX30, once promised as an affordable electric crossover for Americans at $35,000, now cancelled after tariffs and delays sent prices soaring.

The financial toll has been staggering. Honda, General Motors, Ford Motor Co., and Stellantis have recorded a combined $70 billion in write-downs as they reckon with years of miscalculation about where consumer demand actually lay. Ford Motor is taking a $19.5 billion write-down and removing several electric vehicle models from its lineup. The reasoning behind these retreats varies only in the details. After growing nearly eightfold between 2019 and 2023, demand for battery-electric vehicles flattened out last year, then took a dive after federal tax credits phased out at the end of September.

But the driver of most cancellations goes beyond softening demand. The Trump administration rolled back financial incentives for consumers to buy electric vehicles by removing tax credits and is modifying automobile efficiency standards from those approved by the Biden administration to eliminate the requirement for EV purchases. Policy reversal has collided with market reality, and automakers are responding not with patience but with panic.

The Australian context paints a strikingly different picture. Year-to-date BEV sales for 2026 stand at 14,966, compared to 9,516 over the same two months in 2025, representing a roughly 50 per cent increase over last year. In February 2026, EV sales jumped to more than 11,100, lifting EVs to 11.8 per cent of the market, led by a record month for the Tesla Model Y, as petrol sales dropped more than 17 per cent and China became the top source country for new vehicles sold in Australia for the first time since 1998.

This acceleration has not happened by accident. Australia's Vehicle Efficiency Standard, effective January 2025, is forcing automakers to increase battery-electric vehicle allocations, while state rebates and fringe-benefit tax waivers lower ownership costs and widen the addressable base. Unlike American manufacturers, which have been allowed to retreat, Australian importers face regulatory pressure to bring electric vehicles to market. At the same time, Chinese brands are intensifying price competition in the sub USD 30,000 bracket, eroding Tesla's first-mover advantage and nudging legacy OEMs to accelerate right-hand-drive launches.

The gap between North American and Australian trajectories reveals something important about the EV story that policy reversals and quarterly losses can obscure. The collapse in the US was not inevitable; it followed a specific sequence of policy choices and miscalculation. Automakers overinvested in response to regulatory certainty that then dissolved. Consumers never developed the appetite manufacturers had predicted. Prices remained high while charging infrastructure remained patchy.

Yet Australia suggests that EVs can mature on a different timeline, shaped by different pressures. Here, regulatory support remains intact. Charging infrastructure has expanded across inter-city corridors. Competition has driven prices down, particularly in the entry segment where Chinese manufacturers now dominate. More than 153 electric and plug-in electric vehicles were on sale in Australia during 2025, with several new models from Chinese maker BYD scheduled to arrive in 2026, including an electric hatchback priced at $23,990 that could become Australia's cheapest electric car.

None of this means the American retreats are misguided or merely cyclical. The industry bet on electrification becoming mandatory through regulation, then watched governments unwind those mandates. The losses are real; the oversupply in manufacturing capacity is real. Yet the decision to abandon electric vehicles altogether, or to treat them as failed experiments, reflects a choice rather than an inevitability.

BMW's decision to launch the i3 into this fractured landscape speaks to that distinction. The company is not retreating from electrification; it is shifting where it doubles down. In markets with stable policy and credible demand, the investment continues. Where policy whiplash has dismantled incentives and charging networks remain sparse, even premium manufacturers are rethinking. The EV story is not finished. It is simply being rewritten differently in different places.

Sources (9)
Kate Morrison
Kate Morrison

Kate Morrison is an AI editorial persona created by The Daily Perspective. Crafting long-form narrative journalism that finds the human stories within broader events with literary flair. As an AI persona, articles are generated using artificial intelligence with editorial quality controls.