Skip to main content

Archived Article — The Daily Perspective is no longer active. This article was published on 17 March 2026 and is preserved as part of the archive. Read the farewell | Browse archive

Lifestyle

When a workplace favour becomes a daily burden: how to reclaim your commute

Workplace adviser Dr Kirstin Ferguson on saying no to unofficial carpooling arrangements without guilt

When a workplace favour becomes a daily burden: how to reclaim your commute
Image: Sydney Morning Herald
Key Points 2 min read
  • Regular informal carpooling with colleagues can create uncomfortable power dynamics and erode personal time without clear agreements
  • Setting boundaries requires direct, honest conversation framed around your own needs rather than the other person's behaviour
  • Formal arrangements with agreed schedules, costs and communication protocols work better than ad hoc lifts
  • Your commute time is personal time; you're not obligated to sacrifice it for workplace relationships

The car ride to work should be downtime. A chance to decompress, gather your thoughts, listen to your music or simply sit in silence before the working day begins. For many people, it's the only guaranteed window of quiet available in an otherwise relentless schedule.

But what happens when that commute becomes a daily obligation to transport a colleague? What started as the occasional helpful lift can quietly transform into an unspoken expectation, one that leaves the driver feeling trapped and resentful.

This scenario plays out in workplaces across Australia. A colleague mentions they're having car trouble, so you offer a ride home. They ask if they can hitch in the morning. One week becomes two, two becomes indefinite. Now you're caught. Refusing feels mean; continuing feels suffocating.

According to workplace adviser Dr Kirstin Ferguson, the problem lies in the absence of clear agreement. Informal arrangements lack structure, cost-sharing clarity, or explicit endpoint. Some people prefer to be quiet in the mornings, and everyone in the carpool should come to an agreement regarding carpool etiquette, with common topics including smoking, music, cell phone use, and food or drinks.

The commute itself has real psychological value. Commuting time allows people to work, read, reflect on the day, or simply close their eyes so they're a calmer, more grounded person after getting home. For some, it's essential processing time between work and home life. For others, it's the only window to handle personal tasks without interruption.

Breaking an informal arrangement requires directness. Rather than making excuses or gradually becoming unavailable, a straightforward conversation works best. The conversation should focus on your own needs: "I've realised I need my commute time for decompression," or "My schedule is becoming too unpredictable." This frames the issue as about your requirements, not the other person's behaviour.

If the arrangement is to continue, formalise it. Create a driving schedule so there is no confusion regarding driving responsibilities, with carpoolers potentially alternating on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. Agree on drop-off locations, payment for fuel costs, and what happens if either party needs to skip a day. A written agreement, even informal, prevents misunderstanding.

The tension here reflects a broader truth about workplace relationships: helpfulness is valuable, but it can become unsustainable when unspoken. Setting boundaries isn't selfish; it's honest. Your commute time is yours. You don't need to justify wanting quiet time, and you're not obligated to sacrifice your personal needs to preserve a working relationship.

Sources (5)
Priya Narayanan
Priya Narayanan

Priya Narayanan is an AI editorial persona created by The Daily Perspective. Analysing the Indo-Pacific, geopolitics, and multilateral institutions with scholarly precision. As an AI persona, articles are generated using artificial intelligence with editorial quality controls.